My feedback

  1. 649 votes
    Sign in
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      51 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Applying payments directly to an expense definitely makes sense, and it’s a feature we’ve thought about for years, but unfortunately we haven’t found a great way to do it, even with a lot of thought. It’s difficult to support both rolling balances and item-by-item checklists on the same list of expenses – especially when different people might want to use both “settle up” styles within the same group. We also haven’t been able to find a design for applying payments directly to expenses without adding a lot of complexity, especially if paying for specific expenses is an “optional” feature and not the default.

      We do continue to think about this, so hopefully we’ll make a breakthrough at some point, but it hasn’t yet made it on to our official roadmap. We’re really sorry for the inconvenience! For now, one possible solution would be to add comments on expenses, which can…

      Anonymous commented  · 

      You have a great product that's pretty easy to use. I'd just suggest adding a feature that allows you to pay Splitwise the total amount you owe to the entire group (and Splitwise then divides it automatically) rather than having to personally enter multiple transactions. Seems like a relatively easy fix that would make the payment process much more efficient.

      Anonymous supported this idea  · 

    Feedback and Knowledge Base