Family/Couples' account
When I was using Billmonk a few years ago, my wife and I started out with separate accounts, but since we share finances, often times we'd be repaying debts for one another (since we have the same friends) and it got confusing. My solution was to just turn my account into "Joe&Jane Smith" and have all our expenses go through one account and removed her account completely.
I'm not sure the ideal implementation for this situation. Perhaps a "family account." Perhaps the ability to add multiple email addresses would work (but unlike a previous feature request, this application would be such that a family could share an account under different members' email addresses). Then if people tried to add the husband or wife as a friend via email address, it'd add the "family account" instead and work accordingly.
Daniel
shared this idea
Splitwise has some basic support for this now, depending on what you’re looking for. We now support multiple email addresses for a single account, so you can more easily share one account with multiple people.
However, we won’t automatically adjust how much you should owe as a “couple”. For example, if “Bob” adds an expense with “Sue and John’s Couple Account”, then the bill will be split 50/50 between those two Splitwise accounts. I can definitely see how it would be useful to automatically make Sue and John pay for 2 shares, but we’re unlikely to add that feature in the near future. For now, you can still work around this by manually using the “Split by shares” option when adding a bill, and assigning 2 shares to the relevant account.
66 comments
-
Anthony Pelosi
commented
It would be great to associate a couple in a group such that if they owe each other $ it treats it differently. Probably different options, but one that comes to mind is when using simplify debt, and they owe each other the same $ but no one else does (A owes $X, B is owed $X, A & B are a couple, no one else owes or is owed), that it does NOT highlight the $ they owe each other so that the group admin doesn't continue seeing that highlighted and think he needs to take action. In my case, I am a landlord and admin of a group, and I have a couple as tenants, and sometimes one will pay and sometimes the other will pay fo rent, security deposit, utilities, etc. Thanks!
-
Enric
commented
Estaria bien que se puedieran juntar personas para sumar saldos al liquidar. Por ejemplo, yo con mi pareja, una familia entera,... de esta forma se podrían pasar gastos individualizados para cada uno, pero al liquidar considerar la pareja o la familia como uno solo con el saldo global.
-
Ivan Latták
commented
The setting would cause any debts between the two chosen members (whether created directly by group expenses or indirectly by "Simplify debts") to be nullified automatically. This is useful if for example there is a son/father pair or a wife/husband pair as members of a group and they want the debts between them to be automatically settled because they do not care about money ownership between themselves. They still want to be present in the group as two people for the purposes of equal splitting of expenses etc.
-
MT
commented
I know you marked this idea as completed, but it would be great to have a couples (or family) functionality built in, to link people, for trips where you have families, couples and singles. The suggested work around (http://feedback.splitwise.com/knowledgebase/articles/967453-tips-for-splitting-expenses-in-groups-with-couples) is not elegant or graceful, which seems not in keeping with the rest of the app.
-
himanshugupta090
commented
Hi Team,
I have one good idea for you. Suppose we have group of 3 or more members and one person also want to pay for other (for his wife, friend, husband any.) then there should be an option to mark that person by the person who is ready to pay all the debts other person owes.
So during settlement of the balances, everything that blessed person owes will show to the person who mark specific person as blessed.I hope this idea looks good to you.
Thanks ?Best Regards,
Himanshu Gupta -
Chris Reinhard
commented
Would be great to have the ability to to run multiple profiles under the same account. Say I use splitwise as an individual, couple, and family... My understanding is that I need 3 accounts and cannot have an overview of where accounts are at under all profiles.
Profiles should be connected to peoples accounts by phone# / email so my wife could have access to our couple profile without having the data from my personal profile impact her overall balances. -
Julie Nguyen
commented
It would be great if there was an option to add “family members” or “group members” in addition to just individuals. For example, you could add a contact with a phone number or email who would act as the “head of household” but also be able to add additional family members under the “head of household.” For example, we are currently planning a trip and want to split costs equally among 18 people. However, several of the attendees are young children who don’t have emails/phone numbers and wouldn’t even be responsible for settling up their bills. Instead of making dummy placeholders for all these children, it would be nice to be able to add “child accounts” under their parents’ account.
-
Ryan strom
commented
A recent trip exposed what I suspect is a regular use case. My wife and I went on a trip with other couples and wanted to consolidate our debt together so that we were only paying between couples. We still wanted to be in as individuals though because sometimes only some people from each couple would be involved in specific activities (attracting shared costs unevenly). So when we went to settle up we wanted to be able to just consolidate the debt inside the couple so we would only have to settle up between couples. Suspect it could work within the debt simplification module....
-
Joaquim Monteiro
commented
Very useful for couples in group transactions were one pays the others bills, but you still want to include both to even out the split total
-
Saran Laoyookhong
commented
In many trip, I came across where there are couples and/or family members inside the group and are often counted as individual unit. I know there are some options like
http://feedback.splitwise.com/knowledgebase/articles/967453-tips-for-splitting-expenses-in-groups-with-couples
However, the ability to later combine persons into unit would allow the simplicity when entering each expense while keeping the post-trip settlement simple. -
Dan Jackson
commented
We're doing the same thing as Jaime, except for a shared bank account that we pay bills (like our mortgage) from. Being forced to create a "dummy" account was non-obvious & frustrating.
I'm stoked that there's enough flexibility to represent what we want to do: deposits to acct (from individual or from both of us) plus shared bills paid by the account or by an individual. However, the default settings are never right, and its tricky to get right every time.
-
Jamie
commented
My partner and I have a shared credit card, and we often split purchases and use split wise to track how much we each owe the credit card.
Currently we have made an extra account and named it “credit card” we have to make the credit card the person we owe money to, and then manually split payments removing credit card as someone who splits the purchase.
It would be good to have a way to incorporate shared accounts without all these extra steps.
-
Anonymous
commented
I am trying to separate the accounting for two people with the same email address. It appears easy to merge them but not to split them.
-
Niklas Dey
commented
We often make holidays with a bigger group also containing couples, paying together at the end.
The Problem: meanwhile husband and wife pay things in Smaller groups: for example the wife with her girls during shopping and the husband with his men at the beach.
So both Need their name in the List. No shares needed so far. At the end it happens that the wife has to give money to heir husband?! Makes no sense.
-> function needed that combines both of their single accounts to a virtual wallet. Saying „couple A“ owes x€ to Y.
That would be Amazing.
-
Anonymous
commented
Happy to use the workaround for the time being but it would be really useful to have a couples’ facility. It’s the first time I’ve used Splitwise (for a trip with 2 couples and 2 singles) and it’s the functionality I immmediately noticed as missing.
-
Anonymous
commented
Ok... so having just been through this I found a work around
Easiest solution i can think of is run all members of the group as individual accounts during the trip but at the end you can effectively transfer the obligations of the dormant partner to the paying partner by adding an entry where the dormant partner makes a payment to paying partner for the total of all of their payments due to all members.
Can be done either as a payment or a bill entry as the dormant partner paying but the 'split between' name solely being the paying partner.
This leaves the dormant partner as settled and the paying partner now with the net obligations.
You will have to do this for each of any multicurrency balances to transfer each.
Do have 'simplify payments' switched in though.
That worked perfectly for me.
-
Anonymous
commented
Easiest solution i can think of is run all members of the group as individual accounts during the trip but at the end have a merge function to combine family/couples into one settlement unit.
This allows for individuals being separately represented for drinks/ meals if not there as a couple but grouped for settlement.
-
Sam Simic
commented
We are a group of 9 on holiday (3 couples, 2 singles and a baby). We all have a Splitwise account individually, but it would be great to be able to link accounts within couples to simplify settling up.
-
Anil Goyat
commented
hii
-
Anonymous
commented
There should be a setting when adding to a groups, when traveling with couples. The programming needs to associate two people in the group as one but still count them as two. Sounds confusing but when you travel with a couple you’ll understand. Seeing as they usually have combined finances. But still need to adjust numbers that they are 2 people when breaking down so it mathematically works out evenly.