bhumikvaghasiya7695
My feedback
1 result found
-
11 votes
I like the idea of the “sub-group” and see how it could be useful when it comes to bigger groups like that. I’ll bring this up at our next meeting and see if it’s something we can put on the schedule.
An error occurred while saving the comment bhumikvaghasiya7695 supported this idea ·
i.e. when group member in a group is not present at that time expenses of group is not accounted. currently we can says that similar option is available but it is terrible because in this every time when i add group expenses at that time i also deselect the member who not present. so if any feature available by that we can hold group member when he is not available than it was good for users